The notices went out quietly, just a three-line email with no fanfare and no explanation. However, the message was unambiguous: the era of activist immigration judges undermining the law has ended.
As expected, the judges who obstructed deportations and granted privileges to illegal immigrants are protesting. No longer constrained by the dignity of their former positions, many are now going public with claims that their terminations were unfair, retaliatory, or even discriminatory.
Jennifer Peyton, an Obama-era appointee who’s been on the bench since 2016, says she was on vacation with her family when the email arrived. No disciplinary record. Glowing reviews. And yet, out she went. She is blaming everything from conservative watchdogs to the tour she gave to Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin. Durbin, who chairs the same Judiciary Committee that has consistently attempted to obstruct Trump, referred to her removal as an “abuse of power.” But from the outside, it looks like the opposite: the swamp draining, one bureaucrat at a time.
The immigration judges’ union, not exactly a bastion of Trump support, says about 50 judges have been let go and another 50 transferred or nudged into retirement. Its president, Matt Biggs, claims the rest feel “threatened.” That’s what happens when a bloated bureaucracy used to zero consequences finally faces a reckoning.
Carla Espinoza, a short-term judge in Chicago, claims her contract wasn’t renewed because of her gender and her Hispanic last name. However, the case she is primarily referencing? She released a Mexican national falsely accused of threatening the President, a man Homeland Security had flagged. Espinoza dismissed the case, calling it “fair.” Now she’s upset she lost her job.
In reality, these dismissals may be less about race or gender and more about decisions that directly contradicted the Trump administration’s immigration agenda. Does a judge who assists in removing someone Homeland Security deems as a threat suddenly appear taken aback by their dismissal? That’s not discrimination. That’s called consequences.
Erez Reuveni, a former DOJ lawyer who once defended Trump’s immigration policies, now says he was fired after refusing to label a deported Salvadoran a terrorist — even though, by his own admission, the case had been mishandled. He’s turned whistleblower, claiming DOJ leaders are fast-tracking deportations and overriding judges. But what he calls “manipulation,” millions of Americans would call long-overdue efficiency.
Reuveni claims senior officials are bypassing judges to get deportation flights moving. One of those officials, Emil Bove, was just confirmed to a federal appeals court by a Trump-aligned Senate. The same Democrats who spent years weaponizing the courts are now panicking because they’re losing control of them.
These firings, transfers, and confirmations are not chaos. They’re cleaning up. Trump didn’t just promise to secure the border. He promised to end the catch-and-release, rubber-stamp culture infecting the immigration system. That starts with holding judges accountable who have put their politics ahead of the law.
Some of these judges want to rally public sympathy, casting themselves as victims of a political purge. But the truth is, they’ve operated for too long without oversight. President Trump is restoring integrity to a system that has been abused for decades, and the ones making noise now are the same people who never imagined they’d be held responsible.
“One voice can be ignored. But a chorus… that can no longer be silenced,” Reuveni said
He’s right — except this time, the chorus isn’t from fired judges. It’s from the American people demanding a system that works. And finally, thanks to President Trump, they’re getting it.
