Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is facing renewed backlash after a string of incendiary remarks on immigration enforcement and the legacy of slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
During a recent appearance, Omar appeared to forget the name of Laken Riley, the University of Georgia nursing student murdered by an illegal immigrant, and claimed the legislation named after her was designed “for ICE detention centers to make money.”
Omar also reiterated her stance that “nothing is too entrenched to be abolished” when asked about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), even as ICE agents continue to work without pay during the ongoing funding standoff in Washington.
The shutdown has become a flashpoint as Democrats seek to attach health care funding for illegal aliens spending negotiations — a move Republicans and the White House have rejected.
The Minnesota Democrat has also remained unapologetic in her commentary about Kirk’s assassination. In an interview with Don Lemon, Omar said it was “a tragedy that Charlie Kirk was killed in that way” and expressed sympathy for his family, but added, “there is no legacy to honor. It was a legacy filled with bigotry, hatred, and White supremacy.”
Critics said her tone amounted to dismissing the death of a leading Christian conservative voice.
Her remarks sparked outrage online and renewed calls for her censure. A previous attempt led by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) to formally reprimand Omar for her statements on Kirk was narrowly tabled in the House, with four Republicans joining Democrats to block it.
The controversy comes months after Omar joined fellow Minnesota Democrats Betty McCollum and Kelly Morrison in voting against the Laken Riley Act.
The legislation, passed by the House with bipartisan support, required ICE to detain illegal immigrants who commit theft-related crimes and allowed states to sue the Department of Homeland Security over harms tied to illegal immigration.
Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN) broke with her party to vote for the bill, which drew support from 47 other Democrats.
The congresswoman’s stance is unfolding against a charged backdrop in Minnesota.
Federal officials recently disclosed that nearly half of Somali immigrants in the greater Minneapolis area were found to have committed some form of immigration fraud during a September sweep, ranging from sham marriages to falsified documents.
Skeptics say that history makes Omar’s position even harder to defend, while supporters maintain she is resisting what they call the scapegoating of immigrants.
Omar has long been dogged by questions over her own immigration history and family ties, including allegations — which she denies — that she married her brother for immigration benefits.
Conservative watchdogs have filed repeated complaints, pointing to discrepancies in her marital and tax records.
As the shutdown drags on and ICE continues operating without pay, Omar’s comments have put her back in the national spotlight.
For critics, they add to a pattern of controversial statements on immigration, law enforcement, and conservative figures. For her defenders, they reflect a willingness to challenge what they see as unjust systems.
Either way, the latest episode underscores why Omar remains one of the most polarizing figures in Congress — a position unlikely to change as the Senate prepares for its own debate on immigration reform in the coming weeks.
