The lawsuit, which was filed in a California court, accuses Mark Hamill of making misleading and false statements that damaged Musk’s reputation. It also claims that Hamill’s departure from X — one of the world’s most influential social media platforms — was prompted by unfounded allegations and unfair criticism of the platform’s direction under Musk.

The lawsuit specifically addresses a tweet Hamill posted after his departure from the platform, in which he claimed he was leaving X due to “unacceptable behavior” and “escalating toxicity” that had allegedly taken hold on the platform under Musk’s management. Hamill, a veteran actor famous for his role as Luke Skywalker in the Star Wars franchise , has been an outspoken critic of Musk and his business ventures, particularly his management of X, which Hamill described as “a breeding ground for hate speech, conspiracy theories, and general vitriol.”

In his tweet, Hamill said: “I have decided to leave this platform for good. The level of toxicity here is unacceptable and no longer represents the values ​​I stand for. I have seen far too many hateful comments and it is clear this place is becoming more about division than about bringing people together.” This statement was followed by several tweets in which Hamill elaborated on his dissatisfaction with Musk’s leadership, calling out the growing presence of conspiracy theorists and extremist voices on the platform, as well as Musk’s alleged role in allowing such content to flourish.

However, Musk’s legal team argues that Hamill’s allegations are baseless and damaging. In the lawsuit, Musk accuses Hamill of leveraging his celebrity status to spread misinformation and paint Musk’s leadership in a false light. Musk’s legal team insists that Hamill’s departure from X was motivated by personal grievances and a desire to align with a specific ideological narrative, rather than genuine concerns about the platform’s direction or its content moderation policies.

Musk’s lawyers argue that Hamill’s departure was rooted in ideological differences, not any real problems with the platform itself. “Mr. Hamill’s actions were motivated by his own personal biases, not by any legitimate concern for the well-being of users on the platform,” the lawsuit states. “He made allegations about toxicity and hate speech on X without providing any concrete evidence to back up those allegations. His departure was nothing more than a self-serving move to further his own ideological narrative.”

The lawsuit further alleges that Hamill’s accusations of “escalating toxicity” and “hate speech” were part of a broader trend of celebrities leaving X to distance themselves from Musk’s controversial leadership. Musk has been outspoken about his belief in free speech and the idea that social media platforms should be open forums for all ideas, which has earned him both praise and criticism. Many on the political left have accused Musk of turning X into a platform for far-right voices, while Musk has countered that he is merely providing a space for free expression and a diversity of viewpoints.

In addition to his allegations of misrepresentation, Musk’s legal team also alleges that Hamill’s departure has had a tangible impact on the X brand, particularly among its celebrity users. “Mark Hamill is a globally recognized figure, and his departure from X based on misleading and inaccurate statements has damaged the image and reputation of the platform,” the lawsuit states. “This type of behavior not only harms the brand, but also sets a dangerous precedent where celebrities can make unsubstantiated claims and walk away without consequences.”

While it’s clear that Musk is taking a firm stance in the lawsuit, some industry experts believe that this legal battle may be less about the specifics of Hamill’s departure and more about Musk’s broader effort to defend his management of X. Under Musk’s leadership, X has undergone significant changes, including tweaks to its content moderation policies, a shift toward more free speech-oriented principles, and the rollout of new features and subscription services. However, these changes have also been met with controversy, with many prominent figures, including Hamill, questioning Musk’s ability to effectively manage the platform.

On the other hand, Musk’s supporters argue that he is simply exercising his right to defend his business and reputation. “Musk has built a company that is now one of the most influential social media platforms in the world,” said one tech industry insider. “He has every right to take legal action against someone who is making false claims about his leadership and damaging his reputation.”

While Hamill has yet to publicly respond to the lawsuit, some of his followers have rallied around him, praising him for taking a stand against the rise in toxicity and hate speech on social media. “Mark Hamill has always been a champion of kindness and integrity, and it’s no surprise that he would speak out against a platform that he feels has become a haven for negativity,” one fan tweeted.