A federal judge has allowed Eric Peterson, a Missouri man who pleaded guilty to entering the U.S. Capitol during the January 6, 2021 protest, to attend President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration next month.

The ruling, handed down by Judge Tanya Chutkan, permits Peterson to leave his hometown and travel within the Kansas City metropolitan area while on bond. This decision highlights the shifting circumstances surrounding the January 6 cases as President-elect Trump prepares for his second term in office.

Peterson’s attorney, Michael Bullotta, expressed optimism about the future of his client’s case, citing Trump’s repeated assurances that he would fully pardon individuals like Peterson. “The incoming Trump administration’s confirmations that President Trump will fully pardon those in Mr. Peterson’s position on his first day in office” make this decision even more appropriate, Bullotta argued. Peterson’s sentencing is scheduled for January 27, just a week after Trump is set to take the oath of office. However, Bullotta noted that the hearing will likely be moot, anticipating that Trump’s promised clemency will apply.

Peterson’s involvement in the Capitol breach was minimal compared to others. According to court records, he entered the building wearing a bright pink shirt, spent less than nine minutes inside, and did not engage in vandalism or violence. Bullotta emphasized his client’s clean record and military service, portraying him as someone swept up in the chaos rather than a criminal.

This sentiment aligns with Trump’s characterization of many January 6 participants as patriots unfairly vilified by the media and political opponents.

Judge Chutkan’s decision to grant Peterson travel permissions follows a broader pattern of judicial actions reflecting the anticipation of pardons under the incoming Trump administration. Federal judges Carl Nichols and Rudolph Contreras recently delayed proceedings for other January 6 defendants, citing the likelihood that Trump, the head of the Department of Justice, will dismiss charges and pardon convictions.

This marks the first time judges have formally acknowledged the potential impact of Trump’s clemency promises on these cases, setting a precedent that could benefit hundreds of defendants.

Trump’s bold stance on pardoning January 6 participants has sparked significant reactions and discussions within the justice system. Since the events of January 6, over 1,500 individuals have faced federal charges, with nearly 1,200 convicted or pleading guilty. Despite the overwhelming number of cases, Trump has maintained that many of these individuals were unfairly targeted for their political beliefs and support of his fight for election integrity.

Bullotta’s remarks highlight the political nature of the prosecutions, stating that “his scheduled sentencing hearing before this Court on January 27, 2025, will likely be rendered moot” by Trump’s actions.

This statement reflects the growing sentiment among conservatives that the January 6 defendants have been treated disproportionately harshly compared to those involved in left-wing protests and riots in recent years.

Peterson’s case also sheds light on the mainstream media’s role in shaping public perception. Outlets like CNN have focused on the number of convictions and sentences rather than the context of individual cases, further fueling the belief that the January 6 prosecutions are a politically driven effort to silence dissent.

Bullotta underscored this disparity, pointing to Peterson’s brief time inside the Capitol and his lack of violent actions.

As the inauguration nears, Trump’s firm stance on January 6 continues to galvanize his base and highlight his commitment to justice. “We will not allow the deep state to target patriotic Americans for their political beliefs,” Trump declared during a recent rally.